Blog

Data silos haven’t gone away. Here’s what every organization’s next move should be.

September 19, 2025
-
Jake Dyal

Remember about 20 years ago when digital transformation promised to put an end to data silos?

Today, studies put the global drag from siloed, poor-quality, and hard-to-reach data at roughly $3.1 trillion a year, while knowledge workers burn around 12 hours each week just chasing data—locating it, reconciling versions, and asking for access.

Dealing with what should be "yesterday's problem"

Every moment wasted just trying to get the right data represents resources diverted from decisions, missions, and outcomes.

In commercial settings, the tally of that time spent becomes expensive. In national security and critical infrastructure, it becomes a matter of life and death. 

Part of the disconnect is how we talk about silos.

We treat them as org chart problems like marketing vs. engineering, program office vs. operations. Unfortunately, the walls are just as often technical. 

Meaning specialized databases, application-level logic, and bespoke integrations that don’t speak the same language. 

Our goal in this article is to highlight:

  • Why data silos are so difficult to dismantle, and why they naturally form as organizations scale
  • The true cost of silos, including productivity drain, decision-making paralysis, and stalled innovation
  • Where tools and tech are finally ending the decades-long problem of data silos 

Why haven’t we been able to dismantle these data silos?

If breaking down silos were just a matter of asking teams to “collaborate more,” the problem would have been solved decades ago. 

The reality is more entrenched. Data silos are cultural as well as architectural.

At their core, silos are the result of the very systems designed to manage and protect data. Specialized databases, each optimized for a particular function, become self-contained islands. 

Applications built to serve specific departments embed unique business logic that resists translation. 

Over time, even the connective tissue (think ETL pipelines, middleware, custom integrations, etc.) becomes hardened, reinforcing the walls instead of lowering them.

Silos also form naturally as organizations grow and adapt:

  • Departmental independence: Each unit optimizes for its own mission, selecting tools and platforms without cross-functional alignment. What begins as efficiency calcifies into fragmentation.
  • Legacy systems and acquisitions: Mergers and decades of investment leave enterprises with overlapping, outdated platforms. The cost and risk of replacing them often outweighs the appetite for modernization.
  • Disparate technology stacks: New solutions are layered on top of old ones. A best-in-class procurement tool here, a security platform there. Soon the organization is running half a dozen “standards,” none of which truly interoperate.

These forces are why silos persist. They aren’t simply the result of poor communication; they are a structural feature of the technical environment. And dismantling them requires a fundamentally different approach to how information is modeled, shared, and accessed.

Data silos aren’t simply the result of poor communication; they are a structural feature of the technical environment. And dismantling them requires a fundamentally different approach to how information is modeled, shared, and accessed.

The erosion of organizational effectiveness and profits

Data silos cut directly into how organizations function day to day, eroding productivity, slowing decisions, and stalling innovation. 

Productivity drain

A full 79% of knowledge workers report that their organizations are siloed, and 68% say their work is negatively impacted because they lack visibility into cross-functional projects. Instead of executing, teams spend their time duplicating efforts, reconciling mismatched inputs, or waiting on someone else to surface critical information.

Decision-making paralysis

When processes are fragmented, decisions drag. 46% of employees say poor business processes cause decisions to take longer and increase the risk of making the wrong call. When it comes to data issues specifically, that $3.1 trillion dollar problem boils down to an average of $12.9 million annually per organization, according to Gartner. 

What’s more, that figure doesn’t capture the downstream cost of missed opportunities or delayed responses.

Innovation barriers

For organizations attempting digital transformation, silos are a nearly universal obstacle. 98% of IT leaders report some level of challenge with siloed data, and 81% say it directly hinders transformation efforts. Instead of enabling agility, the technical environment becomes a constraint, limiting the organization’s ability to adapt, modernize, and innovate.

Silos are not passive inefficiencies. They are active barriers to effectiveness, undermining both immediate execution and long-term strategy. In environments where speed, accuracy, and adaptability define success, whether in business or national security, these barriers can be the difference between staying ahead and falling behind.

Three places where breaking down silos is mission-critical

The costs of data silos are universal, but certain domains feel them more acutely than others. Defense, national security, and large-scale enterprises operate in environments where the ability to share and act on information is mission-critical. Three battlegrounds stand out where silos must be dismantled.

1. Autonomous systems integration

There are a plethora of autonomous platforms in operation today, from unmanned aerial vehicles to automated logistics systems. Unfortunately, in many cases, they’re also operating in isolation. Each collects valuable data, but without a clear way to integrate, that information stays trapped within the system. Analysts and operators are forced to work with partial pictures, piecing together fragments instead of commanding the full view.

It’s obvious where the promise of breaking silos lies: a continuous flow of information between systems and personnel. In defense and aerospace, for example, integrating telemetry, maintenance logs, and mission data across platforms not only streamlines operations but also reduces redundancy, increases safety, and enhances mission readiness.

2. Supply chain security

Supply chains have become both an operational lifeline and a national security risk. The challenge grows when data about suppliers, vendors, and contractors is fragmented across multiple systems. Each database offers a sliver of visibility, yet none provides the full threat picture.

In the national security space, this fragmentation is a major vulnerability. Comprehensive threat assessment requires unified data visibility across procurement, logistics, and security systems. Without it, organizations are left blind to gaps and unable to proactively mitigate risks.

3. Government and enterprise efficiency

Solving complex problems at scale, whether delivering government services or managing multinational operations, requires accessible information across disciplines within and outside of the organization. Yet bureaucratic information walls and incompatible systems still impede collaboration.

The result is slower innovation, duplication of effort, and scale challenges that grow with organizational complexity. Breaking silos here will take a lot more than technical integration. They’ll need to enable cross-boundary information flow that aligns agencies, departments, and partners around a shared mission.

Across these battlegrounds, the common thread is clear: silos slow progress and actively undermine mission objectives. 

The solution is more achievable than you might think

The scale of the silo problem can make it feel insurmountable. Fortunately, the tools to solve it already exist, and they don’t require tearing down and rebuilding every system from scratch. The path forward is about making data compatible by design, so that critical information can move fluidly across boundaries without disrupting existing workflows.

The path forward is about making data compatible by design, so that critical information can move fluidly across boundaries without disrupting existing workflows.

What does that look like in practice? 

A new class of solutions like IBIS™ (Information Bridging and Integration System) is emerging. These tools focus on bridging disparate systems and enabling universal access to knowledge.

The hallmarks of this approach include:

Integration through agentic AI + knowledge graphs + chat

Instead of forcing users to learn specialized interfaces or query languages, diverse data sources can be mapped into agentic AI solutions that use knowledge graphs like a map for agents and make knowledge accessible via plain-language prompts. This makes information usable not just for data scientists, but for every stakeholder who needs it.

Mission-configured context driving integration

Data integration shouldn’t be abstract. Solutions must align with the mission and context at hand,whether that’s defense readiness, supply chain security, or enterprise transformation. A mission-configured approach ensures that data is not only connected but contextualized for action.

Prompt-based exploration within existing tools

Analysts shouldn’t have to abandon the platforms they know. Modern consumer-grade data platforms allow users to ask prompt-based questions across various systems, while still applying the analytic tools and models already in use. 

This means existing workflows are extended, not replaced

This is where organizations shift from fragmented data environments to those where compatibility is the default. 

​​Taking to the Skies: Drone Data Partnership

Tools like IBIS™ provide a unifying layer that makes information discoverable, usable, and shareable across missions and teams.

We’ve seen what this looks like in practice. In the case of IBIS™ for Airborne Autonomous Systems, we partnered with a UAS R&D company. A small VTOL UAS was fitted with a Software Defined Radio (SDR) and antenna to gather signal readings over a broad range of frequencies.

We ran a data processing workflow on the logged signal readings. This workflow was designed to pinpoint both the frequency and source location of these signals and deliver the results via a chat-based interface, thereby reducing the cognitive load on the operator.

This is a perfect example of how siloed mission data from autonomous platforms could be unified into a single, mission-configured environment. 

Operators and analysts gained access to critical information, enabling faster insights, reduced redundancy, and improved mission outcomes.

Of course, technology alone doesn’t win this fight. Breaking down silos requires:

  • An information-sharing culture: Leaders must incentivize openness and knowledge exchange rather than guarding data as turf.
  • Cross-functional trust: Teams need confidence that shared data will be used responsibly and for the greater mission.
  • Aligned objectives: Silos are less likely to form when departments and agencies are pursuing clearly defined, common goals.
  • The right technology foundation: A platform that supports knowledge graph integration, natural language access, and mission-configured alignment is essential.

Certus Core was built to make this future achievable. By standardizing data compatibility and empowering teams with frictionless access, we help government and enterprise organizations stay responsive, relevant, and effective.

Is it time to break down silos in your organization?

For a limited time, we’re offering a Pilot Partnership Program to let your organization validate IBIS™ with your own data in 8 weeks. 

Secure your pilot spot and see how IBIS™ transforms siloed data into mission-ready intelligence.

From data fragmentation to focus.

See how chat-based queries + mission-derived context + AI governance eliminates the tradeoff between speed and accuracy with IBIS™.

Schedule a demo

Contact

Send us a message and we’ll get in touch shortly.

Your interests

Your contact info

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Be sure to enter all of the required fields.